Migration Migrants to Australia 'free to choose' where to live...

Migrants to Australia ‘free to choose’ where to live despite claims of overpopulation

-

CANBERRA — The Australian government has said while it aims to settle refugees in regional locations, migrants are “free to move” once settled.

The remarks followed claims from local councils that refugees were causing unnecessary overpopulation and were putting a strain on vital services.

Last week, the Fairfield City Council in Sydney’s west expressed concerns that more than 6,000 Syrian migrants had settled within its limits over the last few months, meaning it is now lacking the funds and resources to successfully integrate the refugees into Australian society.

Local mayor Frank Carbone urged the government to act to alleviate the burden placed on his council, but on Tuesday, the federal Assistant Minister for Social Services and Multicultural Affairs Zed Seselja said while the government tries to settle refugees in regional areas, they are “free to move”.

“When the government sponsors these individuals, we do favor regional locations. Many of these people are sponsored by particular communities and will, therefore, share the costs of getting them here. Most often, they will settle where their sponsors are,” Seselja told Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) radio today.

“But when we accept humanitarian entrants into Australia, they have freedom of movement’. We can settle them in Toowoomba, Hobart or Geelong or other regional locations, but in the end, people are free to move.

“We do all we can to provide the services in regional locations, but we can’t tell people that they can’t move to Sydney or to Melbourne.”

Seselja said that while he understands that Fairfield’s mayor is concerned by the sudden influx of migrants to his region, the figures being thrown around in the media “simply aren’t correct”, adding that the council is getting assistance from the federal government.

“Some of the claims made by the Fairfield mayor simply aren’t correct, though we do understand they’ve experienced a large influx. But funding follows the clients, so if more people move to Fairfield, Fairfield gets more funding,” Seselja said.

“As I said, we do our best to settle these entrants into regional areas, but the government can’t dictate terms to people who are settled in Australia.” (Xinhua)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

What is Dalgona coffee? The whipped coffee trend taking over the internet during coronavirus isolation

By Katherine Kirkwood, Queensland University of Technology If you’ve scrolled through Instagram, TikTok or...

COVIDSafe tracking app reviewed: the government delivers on data security, but other issues remain

By Mahmoud Elkhodr, CQUniversity Australia Over three million people had downloaded the federal government’s...

Virgin Australia was never going to last

By Warren Staples, RMIT University; Andrew Linden, RMIT University, and Mariano L.M. Heyden, Monash University

Donald Trump blames everyone but himself for the coronavirus crisis. Will voters agree?

By David Smith, University of Sydney In absolute numbers, the United States is suffering...

Without international students, Australia’s universities will downsize – and some might collapse altogether

By James Doughney, Victoria University The loss of international students due to COVID-19 restrictions,...

Running out of things to do in isolation?

By Anthea Batsakis, The Conversation Right now, the best thing we can do to...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you